August 16, 2008

R.I.P. Arts Funding, we hardly knew ye

2008_08_16ArtsFunding2.jpg

The Canadian arts community, myself included, is up in arms over recent cuts to arts funding by the Conservative government and this utterly ridiculous opinions article in the National Post.

PromArt, a $4.7-million program that provides travel grants to artists for promoting Canadian culture abroad, has been the most contentious program cut. According to Kory Teneycke, the Prime Minister's press secretary, PromArt was cancelled because the grants were going to "highly ideological individuals exposing their agendas", "wealthy celebrities", and "fringe arts groups that in many cases would be at best, unrepresentative, and at worst, offensive."

Let's take a look at these ideological individuals, wealthy celebrities, and fringe art groups that the government and the Post are trying to demonize, shall we?

1. Gwynne Dyer: journalist and military historian

Why, for instance, is it the duty of Canadian taxpayers to fly left-wing anti-war journalist Gwynne Dyer—who is a resident of Britain—to Cuba to hobnob with that country's opinion leaders and give them a "greater awareness and appreciation of Canadian foreign policy, values and models"? --NP

But uh-oh: Dyer told The Globe and Mail that he was invited to speak in Cuba by a Foreign Affairs official who offered to pay for his travel expenses. Dyer never applied for his $3,000 PromArt grant. In fact, he'd never heard of PromArt before he was called out as an example of frivolous federal spending. So basically, the government fudged some numbers so his travel expenses would be covered by the PromArt budget. Classy.

2. Avi Lewis: broadcaster and filmmaker

Why should ordinary working Canadians give former CBC activist Avi Lewis, who now has brought his anti-American schtick to al Jazeera, $5,000 to attend film festivals in Australia and Argentina? Why should they underwrite his jet-setting travels when they are having trouble saving up a few hundred dollars for a summer camping vacation of their own? --NP

He works for al Jazeera, guys. He's a terrorist, don't you get it?

3. Tal Bachman: musician, son of The Guess Who's Randy Bachman, and the "wealthy celebrity" that the blues refer to.

But uh-oh again. Looks like pop sensation Tal Bachman never applied for a PromArt grant either, according to an interview with Eye Weekly:

“Nobody from my camp ever applied for anything,” Bachman tells Scrolling Eye. “My manager got a phone call from the booking agency inviting me on a trip to visit AIDS hospices and orphanages and township community centres for underprivileged youth, which was organized by the Canadian diplomatic corps.”

Also, Bachman says, “This is probably the most publicity I’ve gotten in eight years.” It's sad when the mighty fall. LOL

4. Holy Fuck: experimental rock band from Toronto.

There's an obscenity in their name!!

"I don’t even want to say it on the phone,” Anne Howland, a spokesperson for Foreign Affairs Minister David Emerson, tells the Canadian Press.

5. The Toronto International Film Festival: festival of film and celebrity schmoozefest.

Among the biggest beneficiaries of PromArt is the Toronto International Film Festival, which last year was given nearly $150,000 to bring out-of-country film buyers to T. O. and wine and dine them while they were there. --NP

TIFF co-director Cameron Bailey responds in this letter to the Post by explaining exactly what the PromArt grant money went to. It all sounds much more reasonable when its not put in terms of "wining and dining" film buyers.

What they downplay is all the artists and arts organizations that rely on programs like PromArt to survive. Like the one I work for, for example: the Ontario Crafts Council. I am a grant writer (or a thief of tax-payer dollars, however you want to look at it).

Without getting into too much grant-speak, the OCC is a not-for-profit organization that services professional craftspeople and advocates on their behalf—and we receive a lot of our funding from the government (as well as foundations). But we're not some welfare agency handing out cheques to lazy craftspeople; we produce publications, host exhibitions, and provide professional development support. Next year we're helping to organize an exhibition of Canadian craft at the 2009 Cheongju International Craft Biennale in South Korea, where Canada has been named the special featured country. It's likely that we'd have applied for and received a PromArt grant which would have greatly offset the cost of traveling the exhibition overseas. Now we will have to try and find other routes to get the funding.

The National Post article concludes "If Canadian artists produce world-class art, then it will be noticed on the world stage—with or without government assistance." Which is true in our case—we're not going to back out of the biennale just because PromArt has been cut. But it might be nice to get a little assistance from the government while we're promoting Canadian craft and design to an international market. It's good for the economy, just ask Mr. Florida.

Photo by claylindo.

Posted by Karen

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.sayitwithpie.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/124

Comments: 3 so far

August 18, 2008 10:43 AM

Karen, you used to work for these clowns?

Also, my dad is a pretty small-c conservative guy, but something must be going seriously wrong - in the NP, in Ottawa, in Canada? - when even my dad is going to cacel his subscription to the NP when they move in a few weeks.

August 18, 2008 11:09 AM

For serious!

I imagine my dad is probably the same kind of small-c conservative as your dad, but I doubt that he's too concerned about arts funding cuts. Maybe if I phrase it like, "If these cuts continue, I will be out of a job"...

..that would freak him out.

August 19, 2008 10:15 AM

I don't really care for Olympians, or amateur athletes, or athletes, but I think that what they are going through has a ton of parallels to what artists are going through in this country, and beyond...

Basically, if things continue the way they are, both arts and athletics are basically going to become the exclusive province of the well-to-do - these are not going to be accessible careers for anyone but those who come from money.

I see this as a generational effect, of sorts: Wealthy baby boomers idolized the impoverished artists of their youth, and so sought to turn their children into artists instead of generic, boring rich people like them who merely patronized the artists. Their children aren't talented, though, so they are buoyed mostly on cash and insider connections. This is about the time that all of these so-called 'artistic' neighborhoods begin popping up, except the property values and the rents are insane and all of the local bars and hangouts are basically luxury restaurants where people wear silly clothes.

But none of this centers around a genuine artistic meritocracy - it's just people with money, being recreational.

Sure, they have jobs as baristas, or waiters, or whatever is cool that week, but they mysteriously have assets that nobody on those salaries could possibly afford, and I think that if you could get a look at the bank statements of most Queen Street 'artists', you'd find huge, irregular deposits of cash from the Bank of Mom and Dad.

There is a lot of insider bullshit in Canadian arts, whether Bachman applied for the grant or not. I think that point should be well-taken. The nepotism and even corruption via conflict of interest in, for example, VideoFACT grants is well-known, particularly in the urban music scene. I mean, look at Bachman - he admits to having done nothing worthy of any publicity in eight years, and yet he has a 'camp'? Why does he even need one? I'll tell you why: Because he's in the game even though he don'do'no'in.

I'm all over the place on this, I know, but my point is that I don't think that continuing to fund the present system nor ceasing to fund any system at all is the answer to our predicaments.

You know what? I just hate people who come from wealthy families who don't acknowledge it.

If you're rich and stupid, just be it.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)